Enter your email to receive updates in your inbox:

Einstein and the Path to God

“The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.” - Albert Einstein

One of the biggest articles last week on Digg regarded a letter Einstein penned on January 3, 1954, to the philosopher Eric Gutkind. It features the above quote, which seems to throw water on his famous aphorism, “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” (Note: you can read the full article here).

This article caught my attention due to something I heard last week while listening to Episode 9 of the Oprah and Eckhart Tolle webcasts/ podcasts (I am a week or two behind). In this episode, Tolle made the following point: the path to God is not through your mind, but rather through stillness.

This was an “ah-hah!” moment for me. I have a history of over-thinking things, and I believe this has made me wary of the “G word” in the past. Most of my life I have swung between atheism and agnosticism, and it has only really been in the past 6- 12 months that I have come to connect to my spiritual side and believe in something greater…..

So for me what Tolle said rings true. And if you haven’t already guessed the connection, the reason I found the Einstein article interesting was because here we have one of the most brilliant minds ever writing of religious beliefs and the Bible as a “childish superstition”. But, if you are to believe Tolle, a brilliant mind is no closer to knowing God than a mediocre mind as it is stillness, presence and awareness that are the truth path to God (or Higher Consciousness/ the Divine/ the Infinite…. etc).

Just to be clear, my point in this piece is not to persuade you to believe anything that is true for me. Rather, I simply wanted to share my “ah-hah” moment as I am sure there are many people who, similar to me in the past, have only ever tried to find the path to God through their mind.

What do you think? Would love to hear your thoughts on this topic.

Post Box

13 Comments

  • The Financial Philosopher
    May 19th, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    Peter:

    For more “ah-hah” moments, I recommend reading some of the works of French Philosopher, Rene Descartes, who is widely considered to be “the father of modern philosophy.” He is best known for the quote, “I think, therefore I am.”

    He promoted the idea of “dualism,” which says that the world is made of material and spiritual aspects. The spiritual aspects of reality are those capable of thinking, while the material aspects cannot think. For example, our mind thinks but our body does not, therefore they can be separated.

    Dualism, in essence, makes it easy for a rationalist, such as me (and I think you as well) to intelligently believe in a higher entity and agree with science at the same time.

    For a start, I recommend his “Meditations on First Philosophy.”

    Finally, if you are a similar thinker as I, it is helpful to stop the questioning of whether there is or is not a God but, instead, agree that there IS a God but define what that means for yourself.

    For another french philosopher, who directly addressed the existence of God, except with the use of logic, I recommend Blaise Pascal. Here is my favorite quote from him:

    “Belief is a wise wager. Granted that faith cannot be proved, what harm will come to you if you gamble on its truth and it proves false? If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation, that He exists.” ~ Blaise Pascal

    Now, go define what “He” means for you, read Descartes as well, and you will be well on your path to combine science and religion with your own mind…

    Email me if you want to communicate about this offline…

    Kent (The Financial Philosopher)

    The Financial Philosophers last blog post..Reflections on Wisdom: The End of the Beginning

    [Reply]

  • Akemi -Yes to Me
    May 19th, 2008 at 1:37 pm

    Well, Einstein also said, “My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.” And one of his great qualities was his willingness to admit what he didn’t know. “The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious.”

    I personally don’t think he was denying God in the quotation you used — he was talking about the “word God” and yes, the word God has been abused and overused. This fact has nothing to do with God, but everything to do with humans.

    Peter, I am glad you are becoming aware of your spirituality!

    [Reply]

  • Walking Away
    May 19th, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    I love your blog and read it each time you update (via Bloglines….I have never left a comment before).

    Personally after a lifelong belief in God I have recently become agnostic. The God that I was told loved people enough to send his son to die for them also sends them to eternal hell for not believing in him. The anger, hurt, ostracism, and disappointment I have experienced as a Christian are not worth it to me anymore. I won’t go into it further, but I never in a million years would have believed that I could walk away from God - but he’s not there for me, so its really like walking away from nothing.

    Walking Aways last blog post..Stuff I Heard at Work Today

    [Reply]

  • Peter
    May 19th, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    @Kent:

    You are like a treasure chest of incredible quotes :) Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

    Peter

    [Reply]

  • Ben
    May 20th, 2008 at 5:10 am

    I don’t have any particular religious beliefs. Where religion and God fail me is that some believers who take the moral high ground are anything but moral in their actions. Particularly when religious beliefs are used as a justification and validation for the death and/or physical or mental torture of innocent bystanders. I am not singling out any one particular religious faith here.

    The paradox though is that some believers do an immense lot of good for humanity and lead very moral lives.

    I’m not a libertarian either, or at either of the hard ends of the political spectrum.

    I guess if I have a strong belief it is the following; when I wake up and I plan on having a positive and productive day I will have one and will handle any unexpected problems with a sense of humor, if I wake up and am in a negative mood I will have a miserable day and not have much patience in dealing with unexpected problems. This kind of sounds like the law of attraction, but the law of attraction has been hijacked by some and presented in terms of material greed. At this point in my life, my readings in “Positive Psychology” are what have struck the deepest chord with me.

    Cheers

    [Reply]

  • Scott Young
    May 20th, 2008 at 6:13 am

    Interesting post, Peter.

    I think a lot of the argument comes down to the definition of “God”. It’s easy to get into arguments unless you can define exactly what the word means to you. Some people see God as being a manifestation of nature. Other people see Him as a bearded old man in the sky.

    -Scott

    [Reply]

  • Dennis
    May 20th, 2008 at 11:56 am

    I tend to separate a few key concepts: religion, spirituality, and god. I find religion doesn’t require spirituality but may lead to it. Spirituality doesn’t require religion by may lead to it. God [deliberately and ambiguously capitalized at the beginning of a sentence] is merely a word in my first language often used to describe moments of spiritual awareness.

    Given those distinctions, I don’t find it surprising at all the Einstein could have a firm understanding of the ‘superior spirit’ and find religion to be less than useful.

    Best of luck on your journey. Remember not to “try.”

    [Reply]

  • Michael Miles
    May 27th, 2008 at 4:37 am

    Can’t get to got through your brain. I always go back to the apophatic tradition of medieval spirituality - we cannot say what God is, only what Gos is NOT.

    [Reply]

  • thinker
    August 14th, 2008 at 3:43 pm

    This quote makes much sense to religion and knowledge. It was the tree of knowledge that God forbid adam and eve to eat from. Once they ate from the tree, they were casted out of the garden of eden and pretty much cut off form God. The knowledge they attained, I believe, was the knowledge of them selves, individuals separate from God. The individual and self thinking, is what causes sin. Therefore, a thinking mind will not find God, a silent mind will find God. Through meditation amazing things are possible. I have found the light of God by stilling my mind. My mind will question this after meditation, but when in meditation I truly understand, that is where my soul lies. That is why I think the bible says live in the world but not of it.

    livin in this world but not be of this world

    [Reply]

Share your thoughts, leave a comment!